Finn
FRQ #2
- explained his pretty well
- knew what he was talking about
- didn’t go in depth about the functionality of his code
- No corrections/grading
- Good presenting
Justin
FRQ #4
- explained what his code did
- did some experimentation on his own before starting the FRQ
- Explained the FRQ prompt
- Didn’t really show it working
- showed completed code combining the two methods
- No corrections/grading
- Hard to hear
Mati
FRQ #1
- Remade the code in python since he couldn’t get it to run in Java. Understood concepts but not in Java
- Hard to hear
- Short
- No corrections/grading
James
FRQ #3
- Explained code pretty well
- kinda just read his comments, ChatGPT?
- Didn’t show it running
- Didin’t finish? Still needs to deine his list so no testing
- Code worked